This research is part of a wider bit of research towards classification relations and relevant perceptions with the other social communities. All people was tested after giving the consent written down. Participants was in fact in hopes privacy to do some paper-and-pencil surveys for the ATLG actions privately. Volunteers received extra borrowing activities because of their path level. The latest moral standards of Chilean Look Percentage (CONICYT) was implemented.
In addition, political care about-categorization (asking in the governmental preferences coded with the three groups: kept, heart and you may correct) and you may sexual positioning was indeed incorporated
Participants answered demographic issues to evaluate ATLG authenticity: intercourse, age, socioeconomic standing (high, center and you may low levels were utilized), and faith personality compliment of worry about-reporting into cure for issue “You think oneself a religious individual?” While doing so, a good 4-goods level size to your good 6-area Likert measure concerning your importance professionals give its religious suggestions within each and every day lifetime was utilized.
It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument sites de rencontre chrГ©tiens divorcГ©s was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r (503) = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).
Large (near to 6) scores showed deeper bias, and lowest scores stated favorable perceptions into homosexuals
Part of the goal was to dictate the root ATLG basis framework. Therefore, about three factor designs was in fact estimated: a single-grounds design (ATLG include one homophobia cause of hence all circumstances saturate); a two-factor synchronised design (several dimensions made because of the ATL and you will ATG subscales whoever products is to saturate in the corresponding factor are suggested) an additional order model with a couple of correlated issues (where ATG subscale items create saturate in 2 size – gay Beliefs and you may Nature – and those of one’s ATL scale create saturate in the most other about three – lesbian Traditional Viewpoints, and you will Public Sanction and you may Societal Liberties). These types of five size was basically extracted from analyses done in previous degree (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).
In general, the fresh new fit is ideal whenever design things is actually increased. Ergo, the 2-factor second-order design is the most parsimonious for all indexes acquired. CFI (Relative Boost Index) and you can NFI (Typical Fit Directory) spiders let you know values more 0.9, all of them regarded as pretty good (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Relative Improve Index) well worth techniques 0.9, particularly in the 5-basis model. Concurrently, RMSEA (Options Mean-square Error out of Approximation) directory is actually significant that have viewpoints less than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), thus verifying the best match of five-grounds design.
Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).